Is there a systemic process to continually review and revise “top risks”? This question was asked by a respondent to my survey last month on the topics of most interest to my readers like you. My answer finishes off a series of blogs on Risk Reporting. My answer is yes there is. It is integrated
Cripes! How long have we known of, and not delivered on, the value of KRIs? Whether reporting to the Audit and Risk Committee (ARCs) or to the full Board KRIs should add plenty of extra value. This is what I wrote in a LinkedIn post in 2016 with a few minor edits. I am interested to hear
Board reporting is the logical follow on from my blog last week on reporting to Audit and Risk Committees (ARCs). The “reportable offences” I am talking about this week stem from the type of reporting that is often inflicted on boards from risk and related functions. Reporting that causes boredom, that provides an excuse to reach
Audit and Risk Committees (ARCs) are the topic today in response to a request from a respondent to my recent survey on your preferences on what you would like me to blog about. I am moving on from the strategy for your enterprise risk program to reporting on risk and first cab off the rank
Again, thank you to everyone who responded to my recent survey on your preferred topics for me to blog about, and the type of training you may be seeking. I have had the time to peruse all the requests and I have broken them down into general topics of Strategy, People, Technical, Operationalising and Other.